Skip to content

feat: Use Prisma instead of PG for DB abstraction #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? No Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “No Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? No Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 11, 2023
Merged

Conversation

hofmeister
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Jun 11, 2023

KAP-692 Add PG support using Prisma instead

Will also need to get its migrate DATABASE_URL from local-cluster-service etc

We also need support for running DB migrations.

@hofmeister hofmeister merged commit 663a35a into master Jun 11, 2023
@hofmeister hofmeister deleted the KAP-692 branch June 11, 2023 17:34
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2023
# [1.2.0](v1.1.1...v1.2.0) (2023-06-11)

### Features

* Use Prisma instead of PG for DB abstraction ([#4](#4)) ([663a35a](663a35a))
@kapeta-bot
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.2.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

No Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? No Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants