-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 402
Use LocalHTLCFailureReason in Onion Processing #3744
New issue
Have a question about this project? No Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “No Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? No Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
👋 Thanks for assigning @joostjager as a reviewer! |
@joostjager anything else that you'd like to add here? |
In some places where we have LocalHTLCFailureReason, the string we're passing around is redundant. This isn't the case in all uses of LocalHTLCFailureReason, for example InboundHTLCError provides additional information about payload and blinding related errors that isn't captured in LocalHTLCFailureReason. In these cases we keep the error string, tolerating some duplication.
These error codes were removed from the specification seven years ago to prevent probing, so we don't need to handle these cases anymore.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only comment that I think may not be in this PR is #3601 (comment)
If that one still applies now of course.
@@ -601,19 +601,18 @@ where | |||
|
|||
pub(super) fn check_incoming_htlc_cltv( | |||
cur_height: u32, outgoing_cltv_value: u32, cltv_expiry: u32 | |||
) -> Result<(), (&'static str, LocalHTLCFailureReason)> { | |||
) -> Result<(), LocalHTLCFailureReason> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In decode_incoming_update_add_htlc_onion
, encode_malformed_error
could have its message
param dropped perhaps.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We lose some information from the encode_relay_error
calls eg: "Underflow calculating outbound amount or cltv value for blinded forward" just turns into InvalidOnionBlinding
.
Tension between internal/api struct shows up there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't that indicate that another enum value is needed, that is mapped to InvalidOnionBlinding on the wire?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could add that, but IMO it's not interesting to surface that on the API, and they all map to the same bolt04 code.
So we'd be adding a new enum variant just for the sake of getting rid of a string - not worth the change IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It isn't completely clear to me why something like Underflow calculating outbound amount or cltv value for blinded forward
isn't interesting to surface on the API, while other internal reasons that are also not uniquely mapped to a bolt code are.
This particular string also occurs in the code base multiple times.
But fine to leave as is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To me, blinding errors are totally useless to a forwarding node because somebody else made a mistake.
Other non-bolt04 errors like liquidity errors (actionable) and private channel aliases (interesting, somebody is probing you) just seem much more obvious candidates to be surfaced.
That said, there's also things like ZeroAmount
that we've surfaced which arguably aren't interesting either (buggy sender), but they happened to be co-located with other interesting errors - so acknowledge that there isn't one pure logical reason for this, some of it is just what was easy/reasonable to do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Noted in #3753.
Addressed in 2cc8799 |
@@ -601,19 +601,18 @@ where | |||
|
|||
pub(super) fn check_incoming_htlc_cltv( | |||
cur_height: u32, outgoing_cltv_value: u32, cltv_expiry: u32 | |||
) -> Result<(), (&'static str, LocalHTLCFailureReason)> { | |||
) -> Result<(), LocalHTLCFailureReason> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't that indicate that another enum value is needed, that is mapped to InvalidOnionBlinding on the wire?
👋 The first review has been submitted! Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer. |
✅ Added second reviewer: @wpaulino |
De-duplicate use of u16 failure codes by using a macro that will match against each variant's failure_code instead.
@joostjager your approval came in before I could address last comment last comment - diff here 🙏 |
@@ -1651,14 +1652,42 @@ impl LocalHTLCFailureReason { | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
fn get_onion_debug_field(&self) -> (&'static str, usize) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: document return values
self.failure_code() == LocalHTLCFailureReason::IncorrectPaymentDetails.failure_code() | ||
|| *self == LocalHTLCFailureReason::FinalIncorrectCLTVExpiry | ||
|| *self == LocalHTLCFailureReason::FinalIncorrectHTLCAmount | ||
|| *self == LocalHTLCFailureReason::MPPTimeout |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is intended to only apply to errors that directly map from onion codes, but we could also include InvalidKeysendPreimage
and PaymentSecretRequired
here if we expect this method to be used elsewhere in the future.
error_code, | ||
error_code.failure_code(), | ||
debug_field, | ||
log_bytes!(&err_packet.failuremsg[4..4 + debug_field_size]), | ||
description | ||
error_code |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: no need to log error_code
twice, similar below
@@ -1713,6 +1713,86 @@ impl From<u16> for LocalHTLCFailureReason { | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
impl fmt::Display for LocalHTLCFailureReason { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm a bit hesitant on adding this, mainly because I'm not sure it adds much since the enum variant names are already nicely descriptive and can be easily cross-referenced to the LDK docs if more detail is desired. I also think one of the reasons we had strings to begin with was due to the lack of a nice enum, which we now have. We'll also need to remember to update these strings if any docs on the enum change, potentially. Don't feel tooo strongly about it though.
This PR contains some of the follow ups that didn't make it into #3601:
Display
forLocalHTLCFailureReason
LocalHTLCFailureReason
in onion error processing, removing the last few places where we were using raw u16 valuesfailure_code
andfrom<u16>
to dedup codes