Skip to content

Support for Bulk DependentResource Management #1182

New issue

Have a question about this project? No Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “No Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? No Sign in to your account

Closed
csviri opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Support for Bulk DependentResource Management #1182

csviri opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
dependent-resources-epic needs-discussion Issue needs to be discussed more before working on it
Milestone

Comments

@csviri
Copy link
Collaborator

csviri commented Apr 26, 2022

Support of managing multiple similar resources dynamically - depending on the specs of the primary resource.

To be able to discriminate which dependent resource we are managing the desired should receive the index of the resource:

protected R desired(P primary, Context<P> context, int index) or inside the Context object. (This would require an extended Context for the dependent resources.

Questions to clarify/discuss

Should be this on top level. Thus directly the DependentResource interface should support this?. And have a wrapper dependent resource over that, that supports count? (basically agree on class level design)

Notes

@csviri csviri added dependent-resources-epic needs-discussion Issue needs to be discussed more before working on it labels Apr 26, 2022
@csviri csviri changed the title Support Bulk Resource Creation for DependentResources Support for Bulk DependentResource Management Apr 26, 2022
@csviri csviri added this to the 3.2 milestone Jun 2, 2022
@csviri csviri modified the milestones: 3.2, 3.3 Jun 28, 2022
@csviri csviri self-assigned this Sep 6, 2022
@csviri csviri linked a pull request Sep 28, 2022 that will close this issue
@csviri csviri closed this as completed Oct 4, 2022
@csviri csviri removed a link to a pull request Oct 5, 2022
@csviri csviri removed a link to a pull request Oct 5, 2022
@csviri csviri linked a pull request Oct 5, 2022 that will close this issue
@csviri csviri removed a link to a pull request Oct 5, 2022
@csviri csviri linked a pull request Oct 5, 2022 that will close this issue
@csviri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

csviri commented Oct 5, 2022

There is some issue with linking PRs.
Original PR: #1448

See also: #1521

No Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? No Sign in to comment
Labels
dependent-resources-epic needs-discussion Issue needs to be discussed more before working on it
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant